A “Big Bang” Requires Too Many Coincidences

Our finite observation of unlimited existence dramatically limits it.

The worst problem with any “what caused the universe” theory, is always the “what caused the thing that caused the universe” question and so on. A universe “steady state” theory would help solve this issue. We remove this confusion by viewing the present universe as being an expression of a universal, everlasting, timeless, changeless, “oneness” that has no actual beginning, end, or description, only variations in our observation of it. “Existence” has always existed and always will. This is another reason why I find it hard to accept that everything in the universe started at a certain point in time.

The anthropic principle is an inescapable bias all cosmologists must factor in. This bias means that the only portions of “Reality” we are likely to experience must be those epochs and locations in the multiverse conducive to life and consciousness. Most other parts of creation therefore may or may not be available for us to experience or observe. These infinite regions could be too far away, and/or too far into the past or future. Vast tracts of reality could easily reside outside this universe and therefore far beyond any hope of discovery. Because the universe seems so complicated and endless, I believe there will always be a need for an alternative cosmology.

We need an alternative cosmology to help explain it all.

Could we experience such areas and/or epochs of creation through remote viewing and astral projection? There could very well be some very strange or even deliberate coincidences that had to have taken place to get to a world such as ours that can support life. A “Big Bang” hypothesis seems too simple to explain creation as “intelligently guided” as the one we exist in now. We need an alternative cosmology to help explain it all.

What would have to be far more likely? That the universe ultimately originated from a higher dimensional reality rather than just nothing. Something had to have given the universe the characteristics it has today. The characteristics of the universe could not have simply come from nothing. The “steady state” theory of creation might better explain all the characteristics of the universe. God manifests the characteristics of the present universe similarly to how genes are passed on to children by their parents. As in so many cases throughout nature, everything reflects the image and likeness of the Creator. And who is this “Creator”?Most likely a timeless, universal governing principle or “cosmic consciousness”.  This “cosmic consciousness” exists in and works through higher dimensions extending beyond all time and space.

A “Big Bang” universe from a single point requires too many coincidences.

In the “Big Bang” concept of creation, one has the problem of having to maintain a very delicate balance between too much versus too little expansive force all at once where too little would mean premature collapse of the universe and too much would not allow any stars, galaxies, etc. to form at all before all the particles fly off in their separate ways, as if God would know just how much expansion is the right amount? Then He “sprinkles” in just the exact right amount of “dark energy” to keep it expanding? What a precarious balancing act! A tough act to follow, to say the least! We badly need an alternative cosmology or explanation.

In order to keep this “Big Bang” theory from deflating, scientists have to come up with fantastic coincidences that boil down to six numbers, if any of which are off by even one percent and in one case by several billionths of one percent, we cannot have evolved and existed here! Too many requirements are needed to have a reality such as ours from a “Big Bang” universe to support intelligent life! However, a continuous “steady state” particle emanation from all of space and time would not require so many coincidences.

Wouldn’t a continual “steady state” creation seem more likely than all those coincidences?

And then again, how could the entire gamut of time, space, energy, and matter possibly start from absolutely nothing? Do we really need the conveniently contrived and rather peculiar “inflation” theory to explain the overall smoothness of the universe? A whole universe instantly inflating out of nothing while somehow remaining 99.99% isotropic throughout the entire process has to be rather awkward. We need an alternative cosmology explaining that its smoothness emanates directly from the overall perfect geometric construction of three-dimensional space itself.

The universe could not have simply exploded out of nothing.

Knowing that the universe could not have come from nothing, its mystery would not be so difficult to resolve! The universe did not explode from a single point. It emanates directly from and as an extension of space itself. Matter is an energetic change in the axial direction of the space-time flow, not at all something apart from space. Far from being empty, space consists of multiple interacting, vibrating dimensions, strings or membranes.

The universe is a prismatic reflection of a universal wholeness or oneness. In my alternative cosmology theory, a “Great Oneness” always existed, and had no beginning nor end. I see a universe emanating from a very real, but utterly undefinable, single universal ubiquitous substance expressing itself in an endless fractal pattern. That concept would also be a part of my alternative cosmology theory of creation.

Imagine a holographic universe (“uni” meaning one) with an infinitely intelligent fractal design and beauty. I see this universal design spontaneously arising out of its eternal mathematical principles of perfect harmony. Consider the equation, “0/0 = Oneness”. The universe expresses that way through its universal correspondent, “Witness” or Observer. A five-dimensional geometry of creative (dark) energy is guided by Cosmic Consciousness. This Cosmic Consciousness sustains all things in existence throughout all space and time.

Even the “Steady State” theory may not be sufficient to explain everything.

The “Steady State” theory on its own might not be sufficient to fully explain some subtle changes seen in the overall evolution of the universe as one peers deeper and deeper back into the epochs of time. Furthermore, the universe cannot be static anyway, such a universe would eventually collapse into itself. If the universe is to remain as an ongoing, dynamic, creative phenomenon, it must consist mainly of a continuous force of self-renewing, expansive energy.

Yet the “steady state” theory alone might be insufficient to explain all the evolutionary changes throughout the universe. An alternative cosmology or rather something like a “multi-phase” universe might make more sense as waves of creation maintain an ever-expanding, evolving universe going through various stages of creation, development, and dissolution where endless possibilities (experiments) play out. But its stability and overall smoothness has to come from a steady stream of particles throughout all time and space.

A massive explosion that suddenly started from nothing seems nonsensical. I have a more “flowing” sense of reality as an everlasting ongoing expression of the timeless ocean of “Oneness”. Imagine observing galaxies further and further back through the billions of light years of space. Cosmologists observed there were more quasars, smaller and irregular-looking galaxies with young stars in those early epochs. Furthermore, it appears there could very well have been a time or epoch in the universe when everything was opaque.

While still shrouded in massive clouds of gas, massive stars formed. These stars were so inconceivably huge, that within millions of years, they became exploding black holes. Astronomers on Earth can detect beams of gamma rays emanating from these titanic explosions in deep space. Can one imagine the vast amounts of heavier elements some of these stars must have created?

Inconvenient observations threaten both the “Steady State” theory and the “Big Bang” theory.

Could the answer lie somewhere in between? The deep space background appears extremely black (with an absolute background radiation body temperature of 2.725 degrees Kelvin or -455 degrees Fahrenheit) for a couple of reasons. Massive gas clouds shrouding the early universe might be hiding countless stars created deep inside the dark nebula. Also, we lose sight of the rest of the universe to the cosmic event horizon. All of the most distant parts of the universe are receding beyond the speed of light, therefore being utterly invisible and completely out of reach from Earth.

Mystery shrouds the early universe! We expect the Light of Creation itself with the luminosity of trillions of suns to lie behind this shroud. Too many “inconvenient truths” make it hard for me to accept either the “Big Bang” or just a “steady state” theory.

I favor a “dark energy” alternative cosmology concept of universal phases or waves of creation.

The universal space will always be the source of all energy and its stabilizing factor or smoothness. I see no separation between time, space, energy, and matter. It’s all part of a “Great Oness” or the same, universal Substance. My alternative cosmology theory seems to resonate with the “New Age” Eastern philosophy, especially regarding the cyclic, creative, and sustaining powers of a universal “Prana” or “Shakti” bubbling up from the universal “Oneness” or primary substance of creation. Just the fact alone that space transmits light means that space has to be a universal substance.

The great inventor Nikola Tesla (1856-1943), after having conversed with some of the greatest yogi masters of his time, describes in Sanskrit terms the origin of matter from a “luminiferous ether” in an article entitled Man’s Greatest Achievement, published posthumously by O’Neil in 1944:

“Long ago he [the yogi] recognized that all perceptible matter comes from a primary substance, or a tenuity beyond conception, filling all space, the Akasha or luminiferous ether, which is acted upon by the life-giving Prana or Creative Force, calling into existence, in never-ending cycles, all things and phenomena. The primary substance, thrown into infinitesimal whirls of prodigious velocity, becomes gross matter; the force subsiding, the motion ceases and matter disappears, reverting to the primary substance.”

In time we will all know for sure what really happened . . .

In time we will all know for sure what really happened at the very foundation of this universe which I believe is in fact a massive, ever-expanding, and “luminiferous” ocean of quantum (dark) energy or “ether,” which should not be that great of a mystery. Even your own living room is filled with very much the same thing. A “steady state” theory might not be entirely wrong. This article sums up my alternative cosmology theory.

Related information and movies can be found here: Quantum Cosmology